In the end, thus it comes down to one question. The numbers are not great.Īt the same time, he has ridiculous numbers in shorter formats this year – 567 ODI runs (average 113.40, strike rate 126), 202 T20I runs (strike rate 166) – entirely on home soil. A generational talent without doubt, Gill had broken through to the Indian side with 259 runs at 51.80 in his debut series, against Australia – but that was in Australia (but then, is the team not backing Rahul for his runs outside India as well?).Ī superb strokeplayer, especially when the ball comes on to the bat, Gill has struggled in his six Test matches at home – all of them against England or New Zealand – amassing 263 runs at 26.30. What has perhaps helped Rahul buy some time is Shubman Gill’s career record. While it is not prudent to judge a Test cricketer based on shorter formats, was that not the reason why Suryakumar Yadav was backed for the Test squad in the first place? Ordinary numbers in the two other formats – 361 ODI runs (average 32.81, strike rate 80), 434 T20I runs (strike rate 127) – has led to a persistent outcry among Indian fans, demanding his axing from the side. His only score in excess of 25 has not been the usual delightful hundred but an innings of exactly 50, and he averages 15.90. Since the start of 2022, has has batted 11 times in Test cricket. Unfortunately, inconsistency caught up with Rahul again, and this time there has been no big innings to boost that average. Over a quarter of his runs came in one of his 27 innings – again, as Rahul as it gets. He also had a very good 2021 (461 runs at 46.10), but none of the attacks or pitches in England or South Africa bore resemblance to the ones he is encountering in the ongoing series.Įven then, it came as a relief after he had an ordinary run between 20, when he averaged 22.23 across 27 innings.
SOUTH AFRICA CRICKET CAPTAIN 2016 SERIES
That series perhaps played a key role in India backing Rahul for the current series in Australia. The only time he missed out was when batting was the most difficult – the fourth innings of the same Pune Test match. Even in the first innings of the difficult Pune pitch, he made 64 out of India’s 105. He finally found consistency in the Australia series, where India clawed back from a 0-1 defeat to clinch the series 2-1. Even here, true to his track record, he reached 40 only once in his first eight innings – but that was a 199. Nine of them were during his peak, in 2016/17, when he amassed 708 runs at 50.57. Of the many reasons why both Dravid and Rohit put emphasis on Rahul’s overseas hundreds was the fact that Rahul has played only 16 Test matches at home. And over time, the failures became more frequent.
Rahul was capable of outstanding things, but there were failures too. Looked in isolation, the mean (37.63) does not tell the entire story, for his median score was 5. That template had been laid since the early days of Rahul’s Test career, which took off in a typical Rahulesque run of 3, 1, 110, 16, 7, 5, 108, 2, 2, 2, 158, all of them in overseas matches. In other words, India are willing to accommodate Rahul’s lack of consistency and wait for his ‘extreme’ performances, which have been admittedly special. “So, again, that’s the potential he has, obviously, of late there have been a lot of talks but from us, it was clear from our side, that we want him to go out and just play his game and do what he can do the best that we’ve seen him do over the years.” Rohit weighed in at the post-match press conference: “If you look at a couple of hundreds he got outside India, one of the best I’ve seen from KL, especially at Lord’s, you know, batting on that damp pitch losing the toss and being put in, playing in England is never easy, and he put in a great performance there, and Centurion was another one. Rahul Dravid’s post-match statement (“he’s got hundreds in South Africa and England, we’ll continue to back him”), thus, strikes at odd: while KL Rahul’s four hundreds in 37 ‘SENA’ innings does look impressive, his 27 sub-30 scores do not.ĭravid, however, is not the only member of the team management keen to back Rahul.
0 kommentar(er)
